<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Controversial Video Game Controversies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/</link>
	<description>Know Your Money Finance Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-5280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-5280</guid>
		<description>And Patrick, having just Googled the Aforementioned posting involving the US, your facts seem to be only half correct.  WP was used.  The US admitted it was used as a weapon back in 2005, and the use of WP in NOT illegal.  Source being a 2005 BBC article at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm

Also, the WP was used as a conventional weapon, not as a chemical weapon, as your account seems to suggest.  WP rounds were used to flush combatants in areas devoid of civilians.  

Maybe you should reconsider the sensationalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Patrick, having just Googled the Aforementioned posting involving the US, your facts seem to be only half correct.  WP was used.  The US admitted it was used as a weapon back in 2005, and the use of WP in NOT illegal.  Source being a 2005 BBC article at <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm</a></p>
<p>Also, the WP was used as a conventional weapon, not as a chemical weapon, as your account seems to suggest.  WP rounds were used to flush combatants in areas devoid of civilians.  </p>
<p>Maybe you should reconsider the sensationalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-5279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-5279</guid>
		<description>And too the blog poster, nice article.  I have never even heard of some of these games.  And nice links.  Thx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And too the blog poster, nice article.  I have never even heard of some of these games.  And nice links.  Thx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-5278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-5278</guid>
		<description>Hey, Patrick.  Try practicing what you preach.  All those posters were replying to the very first poster (fart) who typed, and I quote, &quot;played them all&quot;.  Had you read the posts yourself, you wouldn&#039;t look loke such a kackass right now.

     As for the war, to each his own, but judging by your obvious lack of reading comprehension skills  displayed in the first post, I think I&#039;ll form my opinions based upon the information provided by someone a little better at deceminating information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Patrick.  Try practicing what you preach.  All those posters were replying to the very first poster (fart) who typed, and I quote, &#8220;played them all&#8221;.  Had you read the posts yourself, you wouldn&#8217;t look loke such a kackass right now.</p>
<p>     As for the war, to each his own, but judging by your obvious lack of reading comprehension skills  displayed in the first post, I think I&#8217;ll form my opinions based upon the information provided by someone a little better at deceminating information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clone Fanatic</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>Clone Fanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>I think the baby shaker game is just one of them games that you laugh at. 

It&#039;s not like you are going to shake a baby, unless, you are already very mentally unstable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the baby shaker game is just one of them games that you laugh at. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like you are going to shake a baby, unless, you are already very mentally unstable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>haven&#039;t played any of the games yet i have to agree with Smith about the whole bullshit thing.  This is America people.  Freedom of speech.  Interpretation  (i hope thats the right spelling) is a form of speech and thus art is a form of speech and  thus is an opinion.  If someone doesn&#039;t like the damn game then don&#039;t buy the thing. Don&#039;t to the freaking government crying big bad breasts were shown in a video game.  Oh no....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haven&#8217;t played any of the games yet i have to agree with Smith about the whole bullshit thing.  This is America people.  Freedom of speech.  Interpretation  (i hope thats the right spelling) is a form of speech and thus art is a form of speech and  thus is an opinion.  If someone doesn&#8217;t like the damn game then don&#8217;t buy the thing. Don&#8217;t to the freaking government crying big bad breasts were shown in a video game.  Oh no&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4689</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4689</guid>
		<description>Oh yea they used white phosphorus in Fallujah which is against the Geneva convention and causes really terrible fatalaties (disolves skin like acid).

The American military claim they only use it to illuminate areas which is one use for it but eye-witnesses in the form of the soldiers in Fallujah have attested to its use as well as independant observers trying to explain the skeletalized corpses.

Iraq is truly a horrific war and that videogame glorifies one of its darkest chapters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yea they used white phosphorus in Fallujah which is against the Geneva convention and causes really terrible fatalaties (disolves skin like acid).</p>
<p>The American military claim they only use it to illuminate areas which is one use for it but eye-witnesses in the form of the soldiers in Fallujah have attested to its use as well as independant observers trying to explain the skeletalized corpses.</p>
<p>Iraq is truly a horrific war and that videogame glorifies one of its darkest chapters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4688</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4688</guid>
		<description>Ironic, all these flamers are calling this poster a idiot/moron/retard for &quot;claiming he played a unreleased game&quot; when he didn&#039;t.

Furthermore you also act like you commentors are the first to say &quot;6 days in Fallujah is unreleased&quot; well the poster said it first and you go onto make fun of him. If you are gonna bash wha  a poster writes ATLEAST READ WHAT HE HAD TO WRITE.

He never claimed to play 6 days in fallujah and he even wrote about it not being released &quot;publisher Konami dropped the game after a fierce public backlash.&quot;

You flamers are fucking morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic, all these flamers are calling this poster a idiot/moron/retard for &#8220;claiming he played a unreleased game&#8221; when he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Furthermore you also act like you commentors are the first to say &#8220;6 days in Fallujah is unreleased&#8221; well the poster said it first and you go onto make fun of him. If you are gonna bash wha  a poster writes ATLEAST READ WHAT HE HAD TO WRITE.</p>
<p>He never claimed to play 6 days in fallujah and he even wrote about it not being released &#8220;publisher Konami dropped the game after a fierce public backlash.&#8221;</p>
<p>You flamers are fucking morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4680</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4680</guid>
		<description>how can you have played an unreleased game douche?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can you have played an unreleased game douche?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burp</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Burp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>Liar....shut up douche</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liar&#8230;.shut up douche</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/10-controversial-video-game-controversies/comment-page-1/#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.knowyourmoney.co.uk/?p=269#comment-4677</guid>
		<description>This is such bullshit.
People should be able to sell or distribute whatever the hell they want - if a game is somehow offensive to someone, then fuck them. They don&#039;t have to play the game. I think the last one was pretty funny, because people say it&#039;s glorifying an unjust war.  This is an OPINION - that it is an unjust war - and if it is there right to ban a game because of an opinion, then the game designers should definitely be allowed to make their game reflect their own opinion.  It&#039;s hilarious that people get so pissed about not only completely harmless games, but that they go running to the freaking government or newspapers or whatever to discredit the games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such bullshit.<br />
People should be able to sell or distribute whatever the hell they want &#8211; if a game is somehow offensive to someone, then fuck them. They don&#8217;t have to play the game. I think the last one was pretty funny, because people say it&#8217;s glorifying an unjust war.  This is an OPINION &#8211; that it is an unjust war &#8211; and if it is there right to ban a game because of an opinion, then the game designers should definitely be allowed to make their game reflect their own opinion.  It&#8217;s hilarious that people get so pissed about not only completely harmless games, but that they go running to the freaking government or newspapers or whatever to discredit the games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

